Hi Karl, Karl Berry wrote: > Yes ... but I feel strongly that we should try very hard not to break > existing configure setups.
Reasonable goal. > It occurs to me that we could allow maintainers to specify p3-searching > options in their configure.ac, like > > AM_PYTHON_OPTS(python3-check-first python-check-omit) > > (Or additional args to AM_PATH_PYTHON, whatever.) > > That wouldn't have any compatibility issues, and would allow maintainers > to control what gets looked for, for packages that need to force python3. > (Other options could force looking for p2 first.) > > Would that make sense? Yes, I think that idea would work. Or maybe AM_PYTHON3_PATH which requires Python3 so that the interface of the original macro isn't changed. Do you have any ideas/opinions Zach? I don't ever use Python 2 so maybe my ideas for the interface are poor. Collin