On 11/02/2012 12:34 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Well, it turns out that such warnings are coming from the autom4te
> invocation, so I see no simple, non-hacky way to avoid them, unless
> we add a knob to autom4te itself.
> 
> So, autoconfers: would be OK with you to add a new warning "category"
> to autom4te that would suppress *only* this specific warning?
> The warning in question being
> 
>     AC_FOO is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd
> 
> that is emitted by the '_m4_require_call' internal macro (defined in
> 'lib/m4sugar/m4sugar.m4').

Maybe not a new syntax category, but a way to selectively disable just
that warning.

I'm thinking of adding a witness macro; something like wrapping the
existing [m4_warn([syntax]...)] within _m4_require_call inside an
m4_ifdef([_m4_require_no_warning]) probe; then we supply a trivial
definition of the _m4_require_no_warning witness macro in its own .m4f
file.  Then we can modify lib/autom4te.in so that the
Autoconf-without-aclocal-m4 language does not use the dedicated file
(ergo, the witness is not present and there is no warning issued when
encountering required macros); but the Autoconf, Autotest, Automate,
M4sh, and M4sugar languages DO use the dedicated file and therefore get
the warning.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to