On 02/27/2012 04:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/26/2012 02:02 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> Do you really want to start requiring a Signed-off-by line, now? > > I don't care either way, but it's slightly less work without. > > I don't care whether you require it, require it to be omitted, or (like > libvirt) leave it optional; as long as we document _this_ project's > policy, then people can live by the policy. > Given the rationales seen so far, I think it's better to leave our "git policy" silent on the "Signed-off" lines. We can accept patches both with and without them.
Thanks, Stefano
