Hi Peter. On 02/22/2012 08:31 PM, p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: >> On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> With this change, our testsuite now uses 'configure.ac' as the >>> name for the typical autoconf input, instead of the obsolescent >>> 'configure.in' (which has been deprecated for several years, at >>> least since autoconf 2.50). >>> >>> The test cases changed by this commit have been automatically >>> modified with this sed command (using GNU sed): >>> >>> sed -i 's/\<configure\(\\\?\)\.in\>/configure\1.ac/g' >>> >>> I will push by tomorrow if there is no objection. >>> >> I've now pushed the patch, with few minor adjustments. > > A bit late as usual, but I assume the pr???.tests were also > modified? > Yes.
> If they were, was that intentional? > Yes. > If it was intentional, would it also be ok to modify the tests > that need help with ar-lib related problems (would fix a few > FAILs)? > Which FAILs exactly? I've experienced none (but then again, the MinGW/MSYS specifc tests are always skipped on my systems). Also, I've added a new maintainer check 'sc_tests_no_configure_in' to ensure we don't have unwarranted uses of 'configure.in' anymore in our tests, and that is not returning any diagnostic; is this check somehow incomplete or busted? Thanks, Stefano
