Hi Jim, thanks for the feedback. On 02/06/2012 03:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > [SNIP] > >> This seemed a good approach when this test was first introduced, as >> it apparently increased coverage for the less used and less tested >> dependency-tracking modes. But in the log run it turned out the >> approach was actually in part to brittle, causing some annoying > > s/to/too/ > Consider this fixed.
> FYI, with this, all tests pass on Fedora 16. > Thanks for the info; I must admit I had tested the patch there in advance ;-) > I haven't reviewed the actual content. > If you intend to review it later, take all the due time -- there's no hurry to apply this patch. Just let me know, so that I won't push it before you have had time do a review. Regards, Stefano
