On 01/03/2012 09:09 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> The attached patch should fix the issue. I will push it to maint by this
> evening if there are no objections.
>
Hmm, the commit message was quite suboptimal. Consider it substituted by
the following one.
install: pkglibexec_SCRIPTS is a valid prefix/primary combination
It makes little sense for `libexec_SCRIPTS' to be accepted as valid
while `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' is not. So fix this inconsistency by
explicitly allowing `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' as well. It is worth
noting that the inconsistency has been there for a long time,
but only the quite recent commit `v1.11-373-g9ca6326' "Warnings
about primary/prefix mismatch fixed and extended" has made it
noisy enough to be noticed.
* automake.in (handle_scripts): Also list `pkglibexec' among the
prefixes valid for the `SCRIPTS' primary.
* doc/automake.texi (Scripts): Likewise.
* tests/primary-prefix-valid-couples.test: Update.
* THANKS: Likewise.
* NEWS: Likewise.
Reported by Dennis Schridde on the automake list:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-01/msg00002.html>
Sorry for the noise,
Stefano
