On Friday 17 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Friday 17 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:03:59AM CEST: > > > With this change, we improve the code creating the `test-suite.log' > > > global log and the console testsuite summary to make it able to > > > grasp multiple results per test script. This is required in order > > > to introduce the planned support for test protocols, like TAP and > > > SubUnit, which can run multiple testcases per test script. > > > The implementation makes use of a custom reStructuredText field > > > `:am-testcase-result:'. > > > > Why an Automake-specific name here? > > > To make it harder for "generic" output from a test case to match it. > Otherwise, we risk spurious test results. > > > This is user facing, it should be ':testcase-result:'. > > > OK, it seems pretty unlikely that it will be in generic test outputs > either. It's also visually more pleasant, so let's go with it. > Well, I see from a later mail that you dislike the "testcase" term, and by googling I can see that it is rather ambiguous. So let's go with ":test-result:" instead. We can still change it if we find a better terminology later.
Regards, Stefano
