Den 2011-03-01 06:12 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:01:35PM CET: >> Den 2011-02-28 21:36 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >>> It would be nice your sed script would allow sed scripts like >>> s/#// >>> s/ #// >>> >>> to continue to work. But if they don't, for now, that's not a big >>> problem either: failures will be noisy. >> >> Implementing something that covers every corner case requires a >> complete sed parser. That's not viable of course, so that's >> obviously not what you mean. > > Right. I have no idea what we'll need in the end, but as I said: > failures will be noisy, so there is no problem in crossing that > bridge once we come to it. > >> How about: >> >> sed -e 's/ *# .*//' > > Fine with me.
Good, I pushed with that squashed in. I didn't dare a merge to master as the conflicts looked scary. Cheers, Peter