On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [MEGA-CUT]
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:18:32AM CET:
> > That this could be a good idea was "confirmed" by the fact that
> > some tests explicitly put a call like:
> >   AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.])
> > in the generated configure.in, with a comment reading something
> > like "prevent automake from looking into .. and ../.. when trying
> > to copy required files" (or something of this ilk).
> 
> Are you sure most of those are not leftovers from the time where
> tests/defs.in did not copy install-sh into the tree?
> 
Thinking about it... probably yes.

Let's just drop [PATCH 1/2] then.

> > That said, I'm not really pushing hard for the [PATCH 1/2], but
> > even if that's rejected, I *really* think we should apply
> > [PATCH 2/2] (with proper amendings) anyway, as it genuinely
> > increases coverage.
> 
> Review coming up.
>
I will answer that soonish (this evening or tomorrow).

Thanks,
   Stefano

Reply via email to