On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [MEGA-CUT] > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:18:32AM CET: > > That this could be a good idea was "confirmed" by the fact that > > some tests explicitly put a call like: > > AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.]) > > in the generated configure.in, with a comment reading something > > like "prevent automake from looking into .. and ../.. when trying > > to copy required files" (or something of this ilk). > > Are you sure most of those are not leftovers from the time where > tests/defs.in did not copy install-sh into the tree? > Thinking about it... probably yes.
Let's just drop [PATCH 1/2] then. > > That said, I'm not really pushing hard for the [PATCH 1/2], but > > even if that's rejected, I *really* think we should apply > > [PATCH 2/2] (with proper amendings) anyway, as it genuinely > > increases coverage. > > Review coming up. > I will answer that soonish (this evening or tomorrow). Thanks, Stefano