* tests/libobj15b.test (configure.in): In the comment explaining
why an apparently redundant AC_OUTPUT is indeed needed, refer
to the relevant entry in the Automake bug tracker rather than
describing the bug in detail with a FIXME-style comment.
* tests/libobj15c.test: Likewise.
* tests/libobj20b.test: Likewise.
---
ChangeLog | 8 ++++++++
tests/libobj15b.test | 5 ++---
tests/libobj15c.test | 5 ++---
tests/libobj20b.test | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index b98aa53..3b9c1c4 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
2010-12-13 Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com>
+ Libobj tests: refer to automake bug tracker for limitations.
+ * tests/libobj15b.test (configure.in): In the comment explaining
+ why an apparently redundant AC_OUTPUT is indeed needed, refer
+ to the relevant entry in the Automake bug tracker rather than
+ describing the bug in detail with a FIXME-style comment.
+ * tests/libobj15c.test: Likewise.
+ * tests/libobj20b.test: Likewise.
+
Tests: do not use `##' automake comments in-line.
* tests/libobj19.test (Makefile.am): Do not use inline `##'
comments in the definition of AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS.
diff --git a/tests/libobj15b.test b/tests/libobj15b.test
index 000ba1f..3816602 100755
--- a/tests/libobj15b.test
+++ b/tests/libobj15b.test
@@ -24,9 +24,8 @@ cat >> configure.in << 'END'
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCE([foobar.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCE call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END
diff --git a/tests/libobj15c.test b/tests/libobj15c.test
index f1aa259..29e0aa7 100755
--- a/tests/libobj15c.test
+++ b/tests/libobj15c.test
@@ -24,9 +24,8 @@ cat >> configure.in << 'END'
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCES([foobar.c, bazquux.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCES call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END
diff --git a/tests/libobj20b.test b/tests/libobj20b.test
index 1662110..f57a78b 100755
--- a/tests/libobj20b.test
+++ b/tests/libobj20b.test
@@ -26,9 +26,8 @@ AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR([libobj-dir])
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCE([foobar.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCE call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END
--
1.7.1
