Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:06:53PM CET: > On Thursday 09 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:29:33PM CET: > > > + $MAKE distcheck > > > > Can't you either omit this distcheck, or the vpath = : case above, > > without decreasing coverage? > > > The "vpath = :" case also checks the reaction to failing tests in a > VPATH build, so I'd rather not remove it. As for the distcheck, I > think it has a real, albeit limited, usefulness, since it shows that > the package is self-contained and its distribution works as expected. > So I'd prefer to keep it, but I can also remove it if you insist. > > Hmm... but thinking about it, running "make distcheck" only once would > IMHO be better in terms of performance, and wouldn't hinder coverage. > > So what about the following squash-in?
Looks better. OK to go with it! Thanks! Ralf
