Hallo Ralf, On 7 Aug 2010, at 13:03, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Darn, we need another name: 'archive' is likely too common when automake > is going to put all files with that name in the distribution of each > package using Automake. No need to send another patch, but any other > good suggestions that fit in with the existing scripts? > > I don't find arlib so bad, except that it sounds a bit like a library > rather than a program. > > Suggestions appreciated.
That's no different to the situation with 'compile'. I think 'archive' is a perfectly good name as it is. Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
