Just noticed this in a diagnostic...
>From 99d6d57d4dadeeafd8fef8f774d26c6e65886d89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:30:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] use more common spelling in diagnostic: s/canonic/canonical/
* automake.in (check_typos): s/canonic/canonical/
---
ChangeLog | 5 +++++
automake.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 371c868..494f4e1 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-03-31 Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
+
+ use more common spelling in diagnostic: s/canonic/canonical/
+ * automake.in (check_typos): s/canonic/canonical/
+
2009-03-31 Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de>
* configure.ac, NEWS: Bump version to 1.10c.
diff --git a/automake.in b/automake.in
index 6165851..472862b 100755
--- a/automake.in
+++ b/automake.in
@@ -3017,7 +3017,7 @@ sub check_typos ()
{
$varname =~ /^(?:nobase_)?(?:dist_|nodist_)?(.*)_[[:alnum:]]+$/;
msg_var ('syntax', $var, "variable `$varname' is defined but no"
- . " program or\nlibrary has `$1' as canonic name"
+ . " program or\nlibrary has `$1' as canonical name"
. " (possible typo)")
unless $var->rdef ($cond)->seen;
}
--
1.6.2.rc1.285.gc5f54
