Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I decided that this was more than I could implement in the time that I
> had for this, and it is probably more than I will have time for in the
> near future. Alternatively, is there a volunteer for implementing it?
>
> I'm currently trying to gauge whether the question is:
>
> - drop my 'parallel-tests' patches now, try for or wait for something
> better? or
> - add my 'parallel-tests' bits now, and go on?
>
> Adding the patch set now would likely mean some incompatibility in the
> future when your proposed semantics are implemented, which would be bad.
>
> Comments appreciated. And please don't get me wrong, I'm not attached
> to this patch set, but I do want to provide parallel tests eventually.
As they say, ...
A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
and this is a big bird.
