On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:13:55PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Like I said, we would like to update the text if possible, just to bring > > the vocabulary up-to-date if nothing else. I just sent a mail to gnu-prog > > that has more details about why the update process is taking longer than we > > initially thought. Is this the only blocker for your next release at this > > point? > > Not the only one, but for another stable release (1.10.1), I don't think > much else would be needed. IMVHO another major release (1.11) can wait > until some more new features have been added, but from a licensing > standpoint both are identical. > > > Do you have a particular date you want to make a release by? > > No.
Okay, I'll make sure that updating the exceptions for Autoconf and Automake are at a higher priority, along with the other projects that are looking to release soon. Thanks, -- Brett Smith Licensing Compliance Engineer, Free Software Foundation
