Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:39:08PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Should Automake ... add config.rpath, as suggested in Stepan's > > patch, or do you foresee any incompatibilites this way? > > This would make it hard to make config.rpath and lib-link.m4 evolve: a > user could have got lib-link.m4 from gettextize and config.rpath from > automake, and then we get into a version mess.
Yes. > > > The following tests failed, because > > > automake wasn't able to --add-missing config.rpath: > > > gettext.test gettext2.test subcond.test > > Is there no other way to fix the tests? There certainly is: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-05/msg00034.html I merely wanted this clarified -- thanks! (When you're looking at the patch proposed in the link, it would be nice if you could check whether I got the logic for AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION right in automake/tests/gettext.test.) Cheers, Ralf
