Paul Eggert wrote:
Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

What about 3.2.2?  Is it higher quality in your opinion?

3.2.2 still miscompiles Samba on sparc with -O2, so I'm still leery
I'm afraid.

...  I'd trust it to compile "cat", say
Now there's a vote of confidence.

I guess it's time to add the testcase in
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8726
to the gcc regression test suite, if it's not already in there...

- Dan



Reply via email to