Akim Demaille writes:
> I'm all for the removal of this macro.
> I'm for the removal of C's one too (there is none for C++ right?), but
> here we are hitting the backward compatibility barrier. In fact, this
> macro should move under GNU Make's responsibility, since it's probably
> the only user.
If I'm redefining the .c => .o pattern rule for my purposes (e.g.,
dependency generation) then I need to know whether the compiler supports
-c -o, otherwise I have to do something like cc && mv. Please keep it.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders v�g 10:115
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
