Olly> What exactly do you have in mind here? Are you thinking of a macro to
Olly> specify a level or perhaps better a list of requirements, maybe along
Olly> the lines of:
Olly> AC_SET_CXX_REQUIREMENTS(templates libstdc++)
Olly> AC_PROG_CXX
Olly> Or something where the user actually passes in a test program:
Olly> AC_SET_CXX_TEST([int main() {return 0;}])
Olly> AC_PROG_CXX
You can do both, by providing macros to build up a test based on
requirements:
AC_CXX_SET_TEST(AC_CXX_TEST_REQUIREMENTS(templates libstdc++))
You want to have generality because some people might need to test for
something not covered by a standard test. (Of course another way to
do this is to make the requirements mechanism extensible, which is
probably also a good idea.)
Tom
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Morten Eriksen
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Akim Demaille
