On 2025-08-07 17:24:01 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> { /* Sun SC1.0 ANSI compiler rejects this -- but not the above. */
> typedef const int *iptr;
> iptr p = 0;
> ++p;
> + if (!p) return 0;
> }
BTW, I'm wondering whether this test is likely to generate a warning
by future compilers, as AFAIK, incrementing a null pointer is UB.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
