Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes: > * Patrick Welche wrote on Sat, May 09, 2009 at 07:33:12PM CEST: > > Well, it seems there are no arguments against, and I only have a weak > > argument for this patch... > > Thanks. I've pushed it, as I see little possibility for regressions > through this patch. Please consider providing a ChangeLog entry next > time.
Thanks for catching this, Ralf. I saw the original email chain, but have been backlogged in my personal life and have not had time to respond. FWIW, I agree with the fact that you applied the patch. -- Eric Blake
