On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:19:49PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FWIW, what is the reason for g++ to be broken like this, and how could > > it be fixed? > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath> explains the issue a bit. > Basically, g++ relies on having the proper dynamic linker path set up, > and often this isn't done (because the user/installer only wanted C, > where it's not an issue).
gcc (C compiler) sometimes generates executables that depend on libgcc_s.so.1. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
