Joseph Agiato, Petition Filed With New Jersey Court Administrator to Suppress 
Racially Motivated and Selective Non-Enforcement of Laws and Court Procedures


 Trenton, NJ (PRWEB) September 29, 2007 -- On Friday, September 28, 2007, more 
than one hundred investors and supporters of Renaissance Broadcasting 
Corporation (RBC) presented a petition to Judge Philip S. Carchman, acting 
Administrative Director of the Courts of New Jersey, requesting immediate 
action on RBC's June 7, 2007 New Jersey Appellate Division motion, Docket 
Number M-006059-06. The motion seeks to nullify prior state court orders 
entered against RBC in a consolidated action docketed as Township of Waterford 
v. Renaissance Broadcasting Corporation, Docket Number A-005114-92T1. The 
proceedings were initiated against RBC in the Law Division of the Superior 
Court of New Jersey, Docket Number L-1116-80, on September 3, 1980. Prior 
appellate court judgments were entered on June 23, 1982, August 5, 1985 and May 
23, 1994, respectively. 
 The June 7, 2007 motion alleged that the prior actions against RBC constituted 
a clear, 27-year violation of the equal protection of the laws clause of the 
Fourteenth Amendment and section 3 of the Civil Rights Act of April 20, 1871 by 
the State of New Jersey. The civil rights violations resulted in the loss of 
RBC's TV station. Governor Jon Corzine and Lisa B. Jackson, Commissioner of the 
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), were named as 
indispensable party defendants.
 
 The Township of Waterford's opposition to DEP's lease of land within the 
Wharton State Forest to RBC generated the September 3, 1980 complaint. 
Specifically, the municipality demanded that RBC comply with the municipality's 
site plan ordinance as a precondition to constructing the TV broadcasting 
transmission system within the Wharton State Forest. The courts entered 
judgments that required RBC to comply with Waterford's zoning ordinances. The 
municipality later claimed it had zoned the Wharton State Forest for 
residential use only. The courts concurred in the pretext.
 
 The earlier judgments against RBC were based on the false judicial 
presumptions that the Wharton State Forest was not state-owned and regulated, 
municipalities have an interest in land within the Wharton State Forest and the 
lease agreement between DEP and RBC was "for purposes beyond the legislative 
purposes" of DEP.
 
 The recent discoveries of a 1966 edition of Title 58 of the Statutes of New 
Jersey and special reports prepared by the New Jersey Water Resources Advisory 
Committee in 1957 and 1958 proved the absolute falsity of all of the prior 
judicial presumptions. The courts' false presumptions and judgments allowed 
Waterford to challenge RBC's use of the TV facilities that it constructed and 
put into operation and to grant a white owned company the right to use the same 
facilities in exchange for a payment of $450,000.
 
 The discoveries also prove that the Wharton State Forest and Liberty State 
Park are State parks under the jurisdiction of DEP. The September 27, 2007 
petition notes that the City of Jersey City Planning Board filed a civil suit 
identical to Waterford's suit against RBC against a private white-owned 
corporation with regard to Liberty State Park. The published case is entitled 
Jersey City v. Department of Environmental Protection, 227 N.J. Super. 5 (App. 
Div. 1988). The Appellate Division, in agreement with the Office of the New 
Jersey Attorney General, dismissed the suit filed against the white developer 
because the Jersey City Planning Board lacked jurisdiction and standing. The 
Appellate Division further stated, "Generally, local zoning and planning 
regulations cannot affect the State's authority to carry out public functions 
for the benefit of all the people of the State, especially on the State's own 
land." 
 
 "The Wharton State Forest is the largest tract of land owned by the State of 
New Jersey, covering portions of three counties--Atlantic, Burlington and 
Camden Counties," Donald McMeans, founder and president of RBC said. "It was 
acquired and is regulated to secure the public health and welfare; the double 
standard is obvious."
 
 The petition filed by RBC's supporters and investors cites United States 
Supreme Court decisions, which state that a court cannot proceed at all with 
any case for which the court lacks jurisdiction. The petition mentions numerous 
State laws that deprive courts of the power to hear and decide cases like the 
RBC and Jersey City cases. Therefore, the petition concludes that the courts 
could not proceed in the action against RBC and the decision in the Jersey City 
case is binding and conclusive in the RBC case.
 
 The petition claims that the court has an independent and mandatory duty under 
New Jersey Court Rules 4:6-7 to dismiss the original action against RBC and to 
nullify all subsequent proceedings and judgments.
 
 Reverend Morris K. Baxter, pastor of the Cathedral of Love Church in 
Willingboro, New Jersey, says, "The RBC case reveals the other side of racial 
profiling, involving selective and arbitrary enforcement of laws against Black 
people. The RBC case highlights the selective nonenforcement of the laws and 
reaffirms the lingering vestige of the infamous decision in Dred Scott v. 
Sanford when the United States Supreme Court declared that the Black man has no 
rights that the white man is bound to respect." Rev. Baxter continued, "The key 
words are 'bound to respect."
 
 " I am shocked by the failure of Governor Corzine to take immediate corrective 
actions as he is required to do under the New Jersey Constitution," stated Dr. 
Khemfoia D. Padu of Englewood, New Jersey. "It appears the Governor also 
believes that he is not bound to respect the rights of Black people." 
 
 Joyce Abrams, president of Markias, Inc., located in Willingboro, New Jersey, 
said, "There can be no other reason for the Governor's behavior. A child 
looking at the Jersey City case and the RBC case can see the bias and 
corruption. How can the Governor and the Commissioner of DEP honestly claim 
that they don't see it?"
 
 For more information or for an interview, contact Donald McMeans, 609-410-0656.


       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.

Reply via email to