Hi Med,

Thank you for your reply! The markdown looks great.

Sincerely,
Sarah Tarrant
RFC Production Center

> On Apr 13, 2026, at 11:12 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Hi Sarah, all,
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med (as Editor)
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]>
>> Envoyé : lundi 13 avril 2026 22:19
>> À : [email protected]; [email protected]; BOUCADAIR Mohamed
>> INNOV/NET <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; rfc-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Objet : Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-cats-
>> framework-24>
>> 
>> Author(s),
>> 
>> Congratulations, your document has been successfully added to the
>> RFC Editor queue!
>> The team at the RFC Production Center (RPC) is looking forward to
>> working with you as your document moves forward toward
>> publication. To help reduce processing time and improve editing
>> accuracy, please respond to the questions below. Please confer
>> with your coauthors (or authors of other documents if your
>> document is in a
>> cluster) as necessary prior to taking action in order to
>> streamline communication.
>> If your document has multiple authors, only one author needs to
>> reply to this message.
>> 
>> As you read through the rest of this email:
>> 
>> * If you need/want to make updates to your document, we encourage
>> you to make those changes and resubmit to the Datatracker. This
>> allows for the easy creation of diffs, which facilitates review by
>> interested parties (e.g., authors, ADs, doc shepherds).
>> * If you feel no updates to the document are necessary, please
>> reply with any applicable rationale/comments.
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that the RPC team will not work on your document until
>> we hear from you (that is, your document will remain in AUTH state
>> until we receive a reply). Even if you don't have guidance or
>> don't feel that you need to make any updates to the document, you
>> need to let us know. After we hear from you, your document will
>> start moving through the queue. You will be able to review and
>> approve our updates during AUTH48.
>> 
>> Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have at
>> [email protected].
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> The RPC Team
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document
>> during Last Call, please review the current version of the
>> document:
>> 
>> * Is the text in the Abstract still accurate?
>> * Are the Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and Acknowledgments
>> sections current?
>> 
> 
> [Med] All is up to date. 
> 
>> 
>> 2) Please share any style information that could help us with
>> editing your
>> document. For example:
>> 
>> * Is your document's format or its terminology based on another
>> document,
>> WG style guide, etc.? If so, please provide a pointer to that
>> information
>> (e.g., "This document's terminology should match DNS terminology
>> in
>> RFC 9499." or "This document uses the style info at
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fhttpwg.org%2Fadmin%2Feditors%2Fstyle-
>> guide&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee
>> 4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C
>> 639117083599424029%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWU
>> sIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D
>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zAEJkWDGUPhsSNl6gPNq3G2QUZ4WFxH6%2FyRoSJETl
>> bw%3D&reserved=0>.").
>> * Is there a general pattern of capitalization or formatting of
>> terms that
>> editors can follow (e.g., "Field names should have initial
>> capitalization."
>> or  "Parameter names should be in double quotes." or "<tt/> should
>> be used
>> for token names." etc.)?
>> 
> 
> [Med] The document is self-contained. The document was edited to be 
> internally consistent. 
> 
>> 
>> 3) Please carefully review the entries and their URLs in the
>> References section with the following in mind. Note that we will
>> update as follows unless we hear otherwise at this time:
>> 
>> * References to obsoleted RFCs will be updated to point to the
>> current
>> RFC on the topic in accordance with Section 4.8.6 of RFC 7322
>> (RFC Style Guide).
>> 
>> * References to I-Ds that have been replaced by another I-D will
>> be
>> updated to point to the replacement I-D.
>> 
>> * References to documents from other organizations that have been
>> superseded will be updated to their superseding version.
>> 
> 
> [Med] ACK.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 4) Is there any text that requires special handling? For example:
>> * Are there any sections that were contentious when the document
>> was drafted?
>> * Are any sections that need to be removed before publication
>> marked as such
>> (e.g., Implementation Status sections (per RFC 7942)).
>> * Are there any instances of repeated text/sections that should be
>> edited
>> the same way?
> 
> [Med] There is no specific text that requires special handling. 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 5) This document uses one or more of the following text styles.
>> Are these elements used consistently?
>> 
>> * fixed width font (<tt/> or `)
>> * italics (<em/> or *)
>> * bold (<strong/> or **)
>> 
>> 
> 
> [Med] ACK
> 
>> 6) This document contains SVG. What tool did you use to make the
>> svg?
>> 
>> The RPC cannot update SVG diagrams, so please ensure that:
>> 
>> * the SVG figures match the ASCII art used in the text output as
>> closely as
>> possible, and
>> * the figures fit on the pages of the PDF output.
>> 
> 
> [Med] AASVG was used.
> 
>> 
>> 7) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for editing
>> in kramdown-rfc?
>> If so, please let us know and provide a self-contained kramdown-
>> rfc file. For more
>> information about this experiment, see:
>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>> www.rfc-
>> editor.org%2Frpc%2Fwiki%2Fdoku.php%3Fid%3Dpilot_test_kramdown_rfc&
>> data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e7138
>> 9508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117
>> 083599461159%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiO
>> iIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C
>> 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JDQuoZ0ATIXraQmFIHGSY5tCeHy0i6OXKvXJa%2FRsZDw%3D&
>> reserved=0.
> 
> [Med] Yes. The source file can be found here: 
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-cats/draft-ietf-cats-framework/blob/main/draft-ietf-cats-framework.md
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 8) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for
>> completing AUTH48 in
>> GitHub? If so, please let us know and provide all author, AD,
>> and/or document
>> shepherd GitHub usernames. For more information about this
>> experiment, see:
>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>> www.rfc-editor.org%2Frpc%2Fwiki%2Fdoku.php%3Fid%3Drpc-github-
>> phase-0-pilot-
>> test&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4
>> e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
>> 39117083599473413%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUs
>> IlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%
>> 3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SNnKJl68ohFrF5NDKYA0bSQKGOAUlK5ULP%2FR5m%2F%
>> 2BaW0%3D&reserved=0.
>> 
> 
> [Med] Not this time :-) 
> 
>> 
>> 9) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while
>> editing this
>> document?
> 
> [Med] Nothing special to call out.
> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2026, at 3:15 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>> Author(s),
>>> 
>>> Your document draft-ietf-cats-framework-24, which has been
>> approved for publication as
>>> an RFC, has been added to the RFC Editor queue
>>> 
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fwww.rfc-
>> editor.org%2Fcurrent_queue.php&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
>> orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
>> 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117083599486093%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
>> d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO
>> IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9yFnIua9vtSr4Qkf%2
>> F5rquial7LUPOC7p%2BtLbgTzTMPs%3D&reserved=0>.
>>> 
>>> If your XML file was submitted using the I-D submission tool
>>> 
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fsubmit%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair
>> %40orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40b
>> fbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117083599496456%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ
>> sb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsI
>> kFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Q6rC%2FDtZswwLJ
>> GWcMit1P3VaoahXeC8hV5bB%2FaGt%2F7Q%3D&reserved=0>, we have already
>> retrieved it
>>> and have started working on it.
>>> 
>>> If you did not submit the file via the I-D submission tool, or
>>> if you have an updated version (e.g., updated contact
>> information),
>>> please send us the file at this time by attaching it
>>> in your reply to this message and specifying any differences
>>> between the approved I-D and the file that you are providing.
>>> 
>>> You will receive a separate message from us asking for style
>> input.
>>> Please respond to that message.  When we have received your
>> response,
>>> your document will then move through the queue. The first step
>> that
>>> we take as your document moves through the queue is converting
>> it to
>>> RFCXML (if it is not already in RFCXML) and applying the
>> formatting
>>> steps listed at
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fpubprocess%2Fhow-we-
>> update%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Ccb1623fa
>> 86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C
>> 0%7C639117083599506456%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR
>> ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf
>> Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zN89ppz7a4M77oV2loqlq%2BArr3tVOWlnB6cTp
>> gi4y%2F0%3D&reserved=0>.
>>> Next, we will edit for clarity and apply the style guide
>>> 
>> (<https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
>> 2Fwww.rfc-
>> editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40oran
>> ge.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9
>> 253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117083599516381%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
>> JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi
>> TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KtndKB2gpYhrm0IUdibfju
>> oNudJtB0wpZKQApfP2mwQ%3D&reserved=0>).
>>> 
>>> You can check the status of your document at
>>> 
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fwww.rfc-
>> editor.org%2Fcurrent_queue.php&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
>> orange.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
>> 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117083599525895%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
>> d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO
>> IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5ayyT4GtRijx4ZNvsj
>> u5%2F3ihdticIjETdMeGHfaxZLs%3D&reserved=0>.
>>> 
>>> You will receive automatic notifications as your document
>> changes
>>> queue state (for more information about these states, please see
>>> 
>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> Fwww.rfc-
>> editor.org%2Fabout%2Fqueue%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
>> range.com%7Ccb1623fa86ee4e71389508de9999f06c%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4
>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639117083599535548%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
>> 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI
>> joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lv3yAowSteEptTIhgsC
>> lR1%2BL0dw5Z%2FGTXqsjaMNs%2FMQ%3D&reserved=0>). When we have
>> completed
>>> our edits, we will move your document to AUTH48 state and ask
>> you
>>> to perform a final review of the document.
>>> 
>>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> The RFC Editor Team
>>> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to