Hi Ben, Done! Thank you for the new wording.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only) Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the most recent version. For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9931 Thank you, Sarah Tarrant RFC Production Center > On Mar 3, 2026, at 12:43 PM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> > > > Note that this mitigation will frequently impair the performance of > > correctly implemented clients, especially when returning a 407 (Proxy > > Authentication Required) response. > > > Would "impede" or "hinder" retain the intended meaning? > > Not quite. "decrease", "reduce", or "compromise" would be closer but seem > vague to me. > > My preference: > > Note that this mitigation will frequently cause slower connection > establishment for correctly implemented clients, ... > > --Ben -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
