All,

Thank you for your responses and for providing an updated markdown file.

We have noted Mirja's approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9928 

We will await approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page prior 
to moving forward in the publication process.

Please note that there is a two-part AUTH48 approval process for markdown 
documents: one round of approvals for content and a second round of approvals 
for the formatting after conversion to XML. 

For more information about the AUTH48 process for markdown documents, see below:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_instructions_completing_auth48_using_kramdown
 

— FILES — 

The updated files are available here:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928.md
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928.pdf
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928.txt

Diff files showing changes made during AUTH48:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928-auth48diff.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)

Diff files showing all changes:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928-diff.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9928-rfcdiff.html (side by side)


Thanks for your time.

All best,

Kaelin Foody
RFC Production Center

> On Feb 23, 2026, at 8:52 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For the record, I approve the version in the provided md file.
> 
> Thanks all!
> 
> 
> On 23.02.26, 13:45, "Claudio Porfiri" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Editors,
> we have revised the rfc9928.md file, addressing the indicated points and 
> answering the questions.
> The updated version is attached.
> 
> 
> Thank you and best regards
> Claudio, Mirja, Jari
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 8:01 PM
>> To: Claudio Porfiri <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>;
>> Jari Arkko <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Mirja 
>> Kuehlewind
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; 
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>;
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9928 <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-ra-
>> 06> for your review
>> 
>> Authors,
>> 
>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) 
>> the
>> following questions, which are also in the source file.
>> 
>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Please review the text below. We were unable to find "L3RA" 
>> used
>> in
>> [draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis] (now published as RFC 9915).
>> 
>> Original:
>> 
>> Similarly, the specifications for DHCPv6 Relay Agents such as
>> Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA) [RFC6221] or DHCPv6 Relay Agent
>> (L3RA) [draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis] do not foresee the possibility to
>> handle legacy DHCPv4, other than implementing DHCP 4o6 in the client.
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Section 2:
>> 
>> a) May we adjust the items in this list to appear in alphabetical order?
>> 
>> b) May we make these list items consistent as follows?
>> 
>> Original:
>> 
>> * DHCP: If not otherwise specified, DHCP refers to DHCPv4 and/or
>> DHCPv6.
>> 
>> * DHCPv4: DHCP as defined in [RFC2131].
>> 
>> * DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 (or 4o6): The architecture, the procedures, and
>> the protocols specified in the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 document
>> [RFC7341].
>> 
>> * DHCP Relay Agent: This is a concept in all of the following
>> protocols, although the details differ between them: BOOTP
>> [RFC951] [RFC1542], DHCPv4 [RFC2131] [RFC2132], and DHCPv6
>> [draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis].
>> 
>> * Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (or LDRA): This is an extension of
>> the original DHCPv6 Relay Agent specification, to allow layer-
>> 2-only devices to perform a Relay Agent function [RFC6221].
>> 
>> * DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 Relay Agent (or 4o6RA): Refers to a Relay Agent
>> that implements the 4o6 transport as specified in this document.
>> 
>> Perhaps:
>> 
>> DHCP:
>> Refers to DHCPv4 and/or DHCPv6 if not otherwise specified.
>> 
>> DHCPv4:
>> Refers to DHCP as defined in [RFC2131].
>> 
>> DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6):
>> Refers to the architecture, the procedures, and the protocols specified in
>> the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 document [RFC7341].
>> 
>> (etc.)
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 3) <!-- [rfced] Per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"), 
>> abbreviations
>> should be expanded upon first use. How and where should "CPE" be expanded as
>> it appears in Figure 4?
>> 
>> Original:
>> 
>> In a simple case, where the same node hosts the 4o6RA and the DHCP4o6
>> server, it might be enough to only use 4o6RA, as shown in Figure 4.
>> 
>> Perhaps:
>> 
>> In a simple case, where the same node hosts the 4o6RA and the DHCP 4o6
>> server, it might be enough to only use 4o6RA, as shown in Figure 4, where
>> CPE stands for "Customer Premises Equipment".
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Security Considerations:
>> 
>> a) Would the following adjustment clarify what "the 4o6 DHCP specification"
>> refers to?
>> 
>> b) Please note that we have changed "4o6 DHCP" to "DHCP 4o6" in this
>> section for consistency with the rest of the document.
>> 
>> Original:
>> 
>> This document does not change anything else in the 4o6 DHCP specification
>> and therefore the security considerations of [RFC7341] still apply.
>> 
>> Perhaps:
>> 
>> This document does not change anything else in the DHCP 4o6 specification
>> [RFC7341];
>> therefore, the security considerations of that document still apply.
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 5) <!-- [rfced] Appendix A: Please review our questions and suggested 
>> updates to
>> the text below, including the following items:
>> 
>> a) Should the abbreviation for "Baseband Units (BB)" be updated to "Baseband
>> Units (BBUs)"
>> as seen in the text below? If so, please note that we would also update 
>> instances
>> of
>> "BB"/"BBs" to "BBU"/"BBUs" accordingly throughout the rest of this section as
>> well.
>> 
>> b) Should the abbreviation for "Radio Fronthaul Network (FH)" be adjusted for
>> clarity?
>> 
>> Original:
>> 
>> In 3GPP mobile network architecture, the User Equipments (UE) are
>> connected via Radio Access Network (RAN). RAN is built up with
>> Baseband Units (BB) and Radio Units (RU). Radio Fronthaul Network
>> (FH) connects RU and BB, each of RU and BB is an IP host, they may
>> support IPv4 only, IPv6 only or both depending on the vendor and the
>> model.
>> 
>> Perhaps:
>> 
>> In 3GPP mobile network architecture, the User Equipment (UE) is
>> connected via a Radio Access Network (RAN). RAN is built up with
>> Baseband Units (BBUs) and Radio Units (RUs). A radio Fronthaul (FH) network
>> connects RUs and BBUs. Each RU and BBU is an IP host, and they may
>> support IPv4 only, IPv6 only, or both, depending on the vendor and the
>> model.
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 6) <!-- [rfced] Terminology and Abbreviations:
>> 
>> a) We note that the phrase "4o6" appears a few times by itself throughout 
>> this
>> document. For consistency and context, should these instances be updated to
>> "DHCP 4o6"?
>> 
>> We have provided a few examples below:
>> 
>> the 4o6 transport
>> are expected to be compliant with 4o6
>> the introduction of 4o6 at the edge
>> moving 4o6 to a intermediate node
>> a 4o6 client
>> 
>> 
>> b) We note the following phrases appear after their abbreviations are
>> introduced. For consistency, should these terms (on the left) be updated to
>> their abbreviated form (on the right) after first use?
>> 
>> Expansion -> Abbreviation
>> 
>> DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 -> DHCP 4o6
>> 4o6 Relay Agent -> 4o6RA
>> Layer 2 -> L2
>> 
>> 
>> c) FYI - We have added expansions for abbreviations upon first use
>> per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please review each
>> expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.
>> 
>> Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP)
>> Layer 2 (L2)
>> 
>> -->
>> 
>> 
>> 7) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online
>> Style Guide
>> <https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language&data=05%7C02%7
>> Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C9
>> 2e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061535298%7CU
>> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCI
>> sIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata
>> =NUbm8Awlt6vZFqUs9ZWnwkV%2FsGtuzSfOKBfufYW3wak%3D&reserved=0>
>> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically
>> result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers.
>> 
>> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should
>> still be reviewed as a best practice. -->
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> Alanna Paloma and Kaelin Foody
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 18, 2026, at 11:00 AM, [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> *****IMPORTANT*****
>> 
>> Updated 2026/02/18
>> 
>> RFC Author(s):
>> --------------
>> 
>> Your document has now entered AUTH48.
>> 
>> The document was edited in kramdown-rfc as part of the RPC pilot test (see
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Frpc%2Fwiki%2Fdoku.php%3Fid%3Dpilot_test_kramdown_rfc&data
>> =05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6
>> f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061
>> 585387%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLj
>> AuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%
>> 7C%7C&sdata=nFyZNpyPND%2FCGqycymyikpPkl%2B4oeBR3v4591LgK%2B%2Bc
>> %3D&reserved=0).
>> 
>> Please review the procedures for AUTH48 using kramdown-rfc:
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Frpc%2Fwiki%2Fdoku.php%3Fid%3Dpilot_test_instructions_completi
>> ng_auth48_using_kramdown&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com
>> %7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87
>> 953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061631454%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJF
>> bXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFp
>> bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=c03q78ueMElHy2I09RtQanac
>> um3Md7tmBFTUni7FPE4%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> Once your document has completed AUTH48, it will be published as
>> an RFC.
>> 
>> 
>> Files
>> -----
>> 
>> The files are available here:
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928.md&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40erics
>> son.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe520
>> 80c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061691741%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
>> b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO
>> IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=49d38B3jMkJrjpCFKn
>> O8Z5LW%2FlLFA2V4LhI%2FsAyAYmo%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928.html&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40eri
>> csson.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe5
>> 2080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061736038%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
>> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIk
>> FOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=w6JoWvKuBuB7t3
>> T10qkpeSxlTQBViqTzkaStsKzAoW8%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40erics
>> son.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe520
>> 80c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061775326%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
>> b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO
>> IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5pvzTMFBG88PiOjYe
>> %2B%2FqoTQ5oJlrIoVa%2B0rshYygerw%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40erics
>> son.com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe520
>> 80c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381061810730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
>> b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO
>> IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Y0Snjgf9uNWXkJj1j7
>> GCMyN43%2Fyx8jwUp0poBTKzZd4%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> Diff file of the text:
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928-
>> diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc5740434
>> 1d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C
>> 639070381061863119%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRy
>> dWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D
>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=V%2BxMgUetp%2BO4AExrAlqiPMyTHNDUI993SK
>> fju9OrJtM%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928-
>> rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc57404
>> 341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C639070381061913085%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOn
>> RydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>> D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=K4cPdoooMGBvlkqreh0i9yN0UDh1AU8%2F3i5C
>> rF%2B2YkQ%3D&reserved=0 (side by side)
>> 
>> Diff of the kramdown:
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928-md-
>> diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc5740434
>> 1d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C
>> 639070381061956519%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRy
>> dWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D
>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XL90fWqUcvNutj8Ws%2BFNklxLkZjIL%2FfjfM9SZ
>> Hxk8Jw%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9928-md-
>> rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.com%7C9285bc57404
>> 341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C639070381061996806%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOn
>> RydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>> D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MB6wj%2BAD0%2BwFIQMBHKlxnVH%2Bgf3aU
>> KAT6M4itoZ%2F9mU%3D&reserved=0 (side by side)
>> 
>> 
>> Tracking progress
>> -----------------
>> 
>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>> https://www.rfc-/ <https://www.rfc-/>
>> editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9928&data=05%7C02%7Cclaudio.porfiri%40ericsson.
>> com%7C9285bc57404341d4ef7008de6f201c99%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6
>> b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639070381062044083%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8
>> eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiT
>> WFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uSJsYr8%2Fl%2B2Aq2z2n
>> 5VQwmhlvGIJyTgFdrGnHOL9dsQ%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> 
>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>> 
>> Thank you for your cooperation,
>> 
>> RFC Editor
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC9928 (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-ra-06)
>> 
>> Title : DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 with Relay Agent Support
>> Author(s) : C. Porfiri, S. Krishnan, J. Arkko, M. Kühlewind
>> WG Chair(s) : Timothy Winters, Bernie Volz
>> 
>> Area Director(s) : Erik Kline, Éric Vyncke
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to