Sabrina, thanks. Authors, FYI, we have updated the descriptions in Table 1 to exactly match the IANA registry. The change is visible here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9921-lastrfcdiff.html
Alice Russo RFC Production Center On Feb 23, 2026, at 3:56 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alice, > > Apologies for the delay. I’ve updated the registry to reflect the changes > below, but keeping the brackets in place so we can continue linking to RFC > 3161: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/cose.xhtml#header-parameters > > Let me know if any other changes are needed. > > Thanks, > Sabrina > > On Wed Feb 18 22:39:13 2026, [email protected] wrote: >> IANA, >> >> Please update these descriptions as follows to match the edited >> document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9921.txt). >> >> From https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/cose.xhtml#header- >> parameters >> >> Registry: >> >> 3161-ttc 269 [RFC3161] timestamp token: Timestamp then COSE >> 3161-ctt 270 [RFC3161] timestamp token: COSE then Timestamp >> >> >> New: >> >> 3161-ttc 269 Timestamp Token per RFC 3161: Timestamp, Then COSE >> 3161-ctt 270 Timestamp Token per RFC 3161: COSE, Then Timestamp >> >> >> (For background: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/PU8J- >> NdZGSN5J5yMKkhlHZNLC-o/) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Alice Russo >> RFC Production Center > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
