Hi Pascal,

Thank you for your review and approval of RFC 9912.

We have now received all necessary approvals and are ready to move this 
document forward in the publication process at this time. 

Please note that this document is part of Cluster 538. As such, it will be 
published alongside RFCs-to-be 9913 (draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30) and 9914 
(draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40). 

The AUTH48 status page of this document is available here:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9912.

The status of all documents in Cluster 538 is available here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C538


In addition, we have updated this text in Section 3 per Janos’s request, as 
follows:

> What about:
> "RAW inherits and augments IETF recovery mechanisms such as the ones provided 
> in DetNet [DetNet-ARCHI], and in Traffic Engineering, e.g., RFC 4090.”


We have also updated RFC 9913 to reflect your request below: 

> Reading RFC 9913 iI found a nit to be fixed in 5.2.1
> 
> BEFORE
> "The RAW Track described in the RAW architecture [RFC9912] inherits directly 
> from that model. " 
> 
> AFTER
> "The RAW recovery graph described in the RAW architecture [RFC9912] inherits 
> directly from that model. “


— FILES (please refresh): —

The updated files have been posted here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.xml

Diff files showing changes between the last and current version:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-lastdiff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side)

Diff files showing changes made during AUTH48:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes 
side by side)

Diff files showing all changes:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-diff.html (all changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-rfcdiff.html (all changes side by 
side)


Thank you for your time and attention during AUTH48!

All the best,

Kaelin Foody
RFC Production Center



> On Feb 19, 2026, at 3:39 AM, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear editor
> 
> Reading RFC 9913 iI found a nit to be fixed in 5.2.1
> 
> BEFORE
> "The RAW Track described in the RAW architecture [RFC9912] inherits directly 
> from that model. " 
> 
> AFTER
> "The RAW recovery graph described in the RAW architecture [RFC9912] inherits 
> directly from that model. "
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> Pascal
> 
> Le jeu. 19 févr. 2026 à 09:14, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
> Dear Editor:
> 
> I reviewed  this RFC and approve it for publication.
> 
> Many thanks for the hard work!
> 
> Pascal
> 
> Le mar. 10 févr. 2026 à 06:46, <[email protected]> a écrit :
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2026/02/09
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.  
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> your approval.
> 
> Planning your review 
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
>    follows:
> 
>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors 
> 
>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content 
> 
>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>    - contact information
>    - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties 
> include:
> 
>    *  your coauthors
> 
>    *  [email protected] (the RPC team)
> 
>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> 
>    *  [email protected], which is a new archival mailing list 
>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
>       list:
> 
>      *  More info:
>         
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
> 
>      *  The archive itself:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> 
>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
>         [email protected] will be re-added to the CC list and 
>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
>  — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, 
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in 
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files 
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.xml
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912.txt
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> Alt-diff of the text (allows you to more easily view changes 
> where text has been deleted or moved): 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-alt-diff.html
> 
> Diff of the XML: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9912-xmldiff1.html
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9912
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9912 (draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30)
> 
> Title            : Reliable and Available Wireless Architecture
> Author(s)        : P. Thubert
> WG Chair(s)      : Lou Berger, János Farkas
> 
> Area Director(s) : Jim Guichard, Ketan Talaulikar, Gunter Van de Velde
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pascal
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pascal


-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to