Hi Alice, On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 at 22:41, Alice Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authors, > > An additional question: > > 15) Regarding Table 1 > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9921.html#table-1) > -- Are these updates to the IANA-registered descriptions acceptable? If so, > we will ask IANA to update the registry [1] accordingly. The rationale is to > avoid using an RFC number as an adjective and to match the capitalization > within the document (titles of Sections 2.1 and 2.2). > > Original: > > 3161-ttc 269 RFC 3161 timestamp token: Timestamp then COSE > 3161-ctt 270 RFC 3161 timestamp token: COSE then Timestamp > > Current: > > 3161-ttc 269 Timestamp Token per RFC 3161: Timestamp, Then COSE > 3161-ctt 270 Timestamp Token per RFC 3161: COSE, Then Timestamp > > [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/cose.xhtml#header-parameters
Works for us, thanks. > > > Thank you. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
