Hi Richard,

Thank you for notifying us that you approve the RFC for publication.  We have 
marked your approval on the AUTH48 page 
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9768>.  We have not seen Mirja’s final 
approval, so we will wait to hear from her and Bob before continuing with 
publication. 

Thank you,
Sandy Ginoza
RFC Production Center



> On Aug 21, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Scheffenegger, Richard 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've seen that Mirja made/signed off on the final changes, and with those, I 
> approve this RFC for publication!
> 
> In addition, thanks a lot for using the reserved RFC number!
> 
> 
> Richard Scheffenegger
> Senior Solution Architect
> NAS & Networking
> 
> NetApp
> +43 1 3676 811 3157 Direct Phone
> +43 664 8866 1857 Mobile Phone
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Dienstag, 12. August 2025 21:32
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Scheffenegger, Richard 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9768 <draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34> for your 
> review
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION when clicking links or attachments
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2025/08/12
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and approved 
> by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies available as 
> listed in the FAQ 
> (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwziGck49A$
>  ).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties (e.g., 
> Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing your approval.
> 
> Planning your review
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>   Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
>   that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
>   follows:
> 
>   <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>   These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
> 
>   Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>   coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>   agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content
> 
>   Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
>   change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>   - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>   - contact information
>   - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>   Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>   RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>   (TLP – 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwxVHgFJ9g$
>  ).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>   Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
>   content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
>   and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>   
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwwU1JXVnw$
>  >.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>   Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
>   formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
>   reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>   limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all the 
> parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
> include:
> 
>   *  your coauthors
> 
>   *  [email protected] (the RPC team)
> 
>   *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
>      IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
>      responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> 
>   *  [email protected], which is a new archival mailing list
>      to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
>      list:
> 
>     *  More info:
>        
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwxaanKYsQ$
> 
>     *  The archive itself:
>       
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwz9Ua_AlA$
> 
>     *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
>        of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>        If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
>        have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
>        [email protected] will be re-added to the CC list and
>        its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
> — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit list 
> of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem 
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, and 
> technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in the 
> FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating that 
> you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, as all the 
> parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768.xml__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwxslf7wEw$
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768.html__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwwEmRJojA$
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768.pdf__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwy5J6XreA$
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768.txt__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwxFJ3CLPw$
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768-diff.html__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwwQlC5WSA$
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768-rfcdiff.html__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwwysbvRxQ$
>  (side by side)
> 
> Diff of the XML:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9768-xmldiff1.html__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwyH5n7yOw$
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9768__;!!Nhn8V6BzJA!Q35gJuduJBNoS9dEpEp7nYsAhY0L0CFUXpHFNyUH1k_E6dtdba4CymPQXDf3QykFTk71oHRcVbMaKbyHlxAzNGsSTwyNVEnvew$
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC 9768 (draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34)
> 
> Title            : More Accurate Explicit Congestion Notification (AccECN) 
> Feedback in TCP
> Author(s)        : B. Briscoe, M. Kühlewind, R. Scheffenegger
> WG Chair(s)      : Yoshifumi Nishida, Michael Tüxen
> 
> Area Director(s) : Gorry Fairhurst, Mike Bishop

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to