Hi Zoltan,

Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document based on your response 
to our questions. Please see one followup query inline. Updated files have been 
posted below.

> 19) <!-- [rfced] May we update the following unordered list into a
> definition list for consistency with the rest of Section 8.2?
> 
> Original:
>          *  uncompressed: the raw bytes
> 
>          *  if "keep decoder", the continuation of the compressed stream
>             which was interrupted at the end of the previous chunk.  The
>             decoder from the previous chunk must be used and its state
>             it had at the end of the previous chunk must be kept at the
>             start of the decoding of this chunk.
> 
>          *  brotli: the bytes are in brotli format [RFC7932]
> 
>          *  shared brotli: the bytes are in the shared brotli format
>             specified in Section 7
> 
> Perhaps:
>          uncompressed: The raw bytes.
> 
>          "keep decoder": If "keep decoder", the continuation of the 
> compressed stream
>             that was interrupted at the end of the previous chunk.  The
>             decoder from the previous chunk must be used and its state
>             it had at the end of the previous chunk must be kept at the
>             start of the decoding of this chunk.
> 
>          brotli: The bytes are in brotli format [RFC7932].
> 
>          shared brotli: The bytes are in the shared brotli format
>          specified in Section 7.
>  -->
> 
> The original unordered list format is correct here, since only one of these 
> is included, depending on the CODEC bits. 
> 
> However, looking at this part now, the "X bytes: extra header bytes" and 
> "remaining bytes: the chunk contents" should be on the same indentation level.

Thank you for the clarification! Regarding the indentation level of "X bytes: 
extra header bytes" and "remaining bytes: the chunk contents", please let us 
know how the text should be aligned. (That is, should "X bytes: extra header 
bytes" be indented further to align with "remaining bytes: the chunk contents"? 
Or should "remaining bytes: the chunk contents" be outdented to align with the 
current placement of "X bytes: extra header bytes"?)

Current:
   X bytes:  Extra header bytes, depending on CHUNK_TYPE.  If present,
      they are specified in the subsequent sections.

      remaining bytes:  The chunk contents.  The uncompressed data in
         the chunk content depends on CHUNK_TYPE and is specified in the
         subsequent sections.  The compressed data has following format
         depending on CODEC:

         *  uncompressed: The raw bytes.

         *  If "keep decoder", the continuation of the compressed stream
            that was interrupted at the end of the previous chunk.  The
            decoder from the previous chunk must be used and its state
            it had at the end of the previous chunk must be kept at the
            start of the decoding of this chunk.

         *  brotli: The bytes are in brotli format [RFC7932].

         *  shared brotli: The bytes are in the shared brotli format
            specified in Section 7.


The files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841.xml

The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841-auth48diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9841-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9841

Thank you,
Madison Church
RFC Production Center

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to