I'll second Nancy's approval. Thanks Carsten for swatting our nit.
On 13.05.25 15:49, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) wrote:
Hi,
I am good with this version and approve moving it forward. Thank you
all for pushing this through.
Best, Nancy
*From: *Madison Church <[email protected]>
*Date: *Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at 6:48 AM
*To: *Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>, Henk Birkholz
<[email protected]>, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
<[email protected]>, Jeremy O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
*Cc: *RFC Editor <[email protected]>, [email protected]
<[email protected]>, rats-chairs <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>,
Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>, [email protected]
<[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9781 <draft-ietf-rats-uccs-12>
for your review
Hi Carsten,
Thank you for your reply! We have made your requested updates and noted
your approval on the AUTH48 status page (see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9781)
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9781)>.
The updated files have been posted here (please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.txt
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.txt>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.pdf
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.pdf>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.html
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.html>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.xml
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781.xml>
The updated diffs have been posted here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-diff.html
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-diff.html>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-rfcdiff.html
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-rfcdiff.html> (side by side)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-auth48diff.html
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-auth48diff.html>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-auth48rfcdiff.html
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9781-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by
side)
Once we receive approvals from Henk, Nancy, and Jeremy, we will move
this document forward in the publication process.
Thanks!
RFC Editor/mc
On May 10, 2025, at 2:42 PM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-07, at 18:00, Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote:
We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the
publication process.
I have two more:
(1)
(Section 4):
OLD:
When a UCCS emerges from the Secure Channel and into the receiver, the security properties of the secure channel no longer protect the UCCS, which now are subject to the same security properties as any other unprotected data in the Verifier environment. If the receiver subsequently forwards UCCS, they are treated as though
they originated within the receiver.
NEW:
When a UCCS emerges from the Secure Channel and into the receiver, the security
properties of the secure channel no longer protect the UCCS, which now is
subject
_______________________________________________________________________^
to the same security properties as any other unprotected data in the Verifier
environment. If the receiver subsequently forwards UCCS, they are treated as
though they originated within the receiver.
The “which" points to the (now singular) UCCS, not the security properties
(which aren’t subject to security properties!). Sorry for misleading with my
original suggestion.
(2)
I note that since the acronym “CWT” no longer is in the title, it probably
should be added to the keywords.
With these two changes, RFC-to-be 9781 is now ready for publication.
Grüße, Carsten
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
