On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 06:58:57AM +0000, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for zoom-firejail [2]: > > This just runs zoom on firejail. > > But it seems user-side workaround is also needed according to > maintainer of this :https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zoom- > firejail#comment-978751 . > > If it is impossible to add package itself, this should be move to Arch > wiki. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/oech3/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zoom-firejail/
Firejail 0.9.74 is released and it contains the fix, no workaround is needed any more. I have tested it on my Nvidia GPU. Please read [1] carefully, I mentioned there was a pull request [2] fixed the issue and I also wrote "wait until new firejail version 0.9.74", the meaning of this is firejail version 0.9.74 contains the fix so no workaround is needed if you are using firejail version 0.9.74. Arch Linux already has official firejail version 0.9.74 package since 2025-03-25 see [3]. I repeat again, no user-side workaround is needed for aur/zoom-firejail to work now because official Arch firejail version 0.9.74 package contains the fix for the issue in pull request [2]. Please do not delete zoom-firejail package from AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zoom-firejail#comment-978751 [2] https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/pull/6387 [3] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/firejail/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
