Hey, This user has spuriously opened a deletion request for this and a few other multi-arch packages I manage for Kubernetes, namely:
- kubectl-bin - kubeadm-bin - kubelet-bin - cni-plugins-bin While they do not see the value in multi-arch packages which extend beyond upstream support, I do not believe this precludes the packages' existence to support more architectures. As I have stated to them in other messages, if they have a particular issue with the package not working for them on other architectures they should instead inform me to remedy the issue, rather than spurious deletion requests, and inflammatory language. Thanks, Dr. GO PS: I have replied to each deletion request to ensure they are in the chain for each request, so apologies for the repetition of the message if you happen to read all back to back. On Monday, February 10th, 2025 at 8:48 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org <not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > > vitaliikuzhdin [1] filed a deletion request for kubeadm-bin [2]: > > Already exists in the official repositories. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vitaliikuzhdin/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kubeadm-bin/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
