>All of these were maintained (or atleast have a maintainer assigned), so >I really think we are looking at different data.
>I think the other mail was quite clear on that: There will be no future >mass cleanups withouth first being (properly) coordinated among the >other AUR Moderators. Hi @gromit, Thank you for your response / inquiry. The add-on request I made in a reply email is no longer relevant. @serebit's old orphan package purge done in Feb 2024 has taken care of dropping all abandoned 'perl6-*' prefixed packages. Thank you, @serebit! Cheers, Marcell / MarsSeed On 7 March 2024 16:22:13 GMT+01:00, Christian Heusel <christ...@heusel.eu> wrote: >On 24/02/28 01:13PM, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >> Hi @serebit, > >Hey Marcell, > >> Can you maybe delete *all* packages prefixed with 'perl6-'? > >A [quick search][0] on the AUR for me only found 6 packages: >- perl6-panda >- perl-perl6-perldoc-to-ansi >- perl-perl6-perldoc >- perl-perl6-form >- perl-perl6-export >- perl-perl6-doc > >> The majority of them have packaging issues, all of them are orphans >> (most are from 2017/2018, some I updated last year but then gave up), >> and actually Perl6 became Raku since that submission year. >> None of the perl6 package are in use on AUR. (Many are broken as well, >> several are also deprecated / abandoned by their respective upstream >> on favor of a different implementation.) > >All of these were maintained (or atleast have a maintainer assigned), so >I really think we are looking at different data. > >> Thank you for considering my proposal, and if you can and do take this >> up. > >I think the other mail was quite clear on that: There will be no future >mass cleanups withouth first being (properly) coordinated among the >other AUR Moderators. > >> Cheers >> Marcell / MarsSeed > >Cheers, >gromit > >[0]: >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages?O=0&SeB=n&K=perl6&outdated=&SB=p&SO=d&PP=50&submit=Go
