Yeah, I agree. On Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 15:16 Marcell Meszaros, <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> wrote:
> Upstream stated they have no intention or capacity to maintain the legacy > gnuradio 3.8 branch. > > This git package does not provide 'gnuradio38' [a], so it has no > dependents, only the latter does. > > But both this and that package fails to build. > > The few dependents of 'gnuradio38' are all dead and fail to build as well, > or some of them actually have upstream updates or third-party forks that > work with gnuradio 3.10. > > So keeping this package is completely superfluous in my view. > > [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnuradio38?all_reqs=1#pkgreqs > > > On 13 August 2023 06:46:05 GMT+02:00, "Nick Østergaard" <oe.n...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am not sure that is fair as such, people could be using it for legacy >> oot modules, and there is someone trying it out at least two weeks ago, see >> https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6762 >> >> I must admit, that I have not touched it in a while. >> >> Nick >> >> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 01:35, <not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: >> >>> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gnuradio-maint38-git [2]: >>> >>> gnuradio 3.8 is not maintained since >>> 2022-03 (last release 2022-01). [a] >>> >>> Nothing depends on this VCS package. >>> >>> I recommend deletion. >>> >>> [a]: https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/commits/maint-3.8 >>> >>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnuradio-maint38-git/ >> >>
