Compared to the discontinued, experimental, barebones, alpha stage oyepa, the 
following actively developed application seems to be way more mature and useful 
for the same purpose:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tagspaces

On 17 October 2023 09:40:35 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for oyepa [2]:
>
>I think it's better to delete this Python2 PyQt4 GUI based file
>organizer from 2011, which was only an experiment, not something
>intended for production use. It brands itself a "tagging file system
>emulator".
>
>I don't think it's useful for users. In fact it seems quite
>cumbersome.
>
>And it depends on discontinued, unmaintained components like PyQt4 and
>python2-pyinotify (whose upstream is not changed since 2014). Those
>two AUR packages do not follow the Arch Python package guidelines and
>PyPA's recommendations regarding the migration to setuptools from
>stdlib's deprecated distutils.
>
>There are other tools that help users organize files better.
>
>PyQt4 as of now is a dual Python2/Python3 package, broken on Python
>3.12. But oyepa is the only mandatory consumer of either PyQt4
>subpackage that seems maintained on AUR. Almost all other packages are
>broken, and none of them are maintained or used, so they can be delete
>as well. Some packages have updates to port them to Python3/Qt5. It
>seems PyQt4 itself can soon be retired.
>
>AUR submission guidelines say that packages kept there should be
>useful for / required by more than a few people. I think there is no
>evidence for this being a package that qualifies.
>
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/oyepa/

Reply via email to