Actually there are some other viable names for this package that comes to my mind:
* python-requirements-language-server (original AUR name) * pip-requirements-language-server * pip-requirements.txt-language-server (looks a bit clunky) * pip-requirements-txt-language-server But this package should definitely not be called 'requirements-language-server'. Because it is far too generic, so it doesn't make it obvious what this LSP implementation is for. On 20 July 2023 19:22:09 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> wrote: >Please don't do this renaming/merging; it doesn't make any sense. > >This language server is for Python requirements lists, not any other >requirements definition. > >Therefore the only package name that makes sense is the original one: > >python-requirements-language-server > >On 20 July 2023 18:58:35 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>Freed [1] filed a request to merge python-requirements-language-server >>[2] into requirements-language-server [3]: >> >>Rename >> >>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freed/ >>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-requirements-language-server/ >>[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/requirements-language-server/
