U-turn: +1 for the merge. @KokaKiwi, sorry, I didn't know you were the maintainer of the target package, lua-moonscript.
You also didn't say the latter is a split package for different Lua versions. I infer you intend to add a lua51-specific subpackage there. Now I see that is the right approach. Also the old source package lua51-moonscript is an outdated orphan. On 7 July 2023 14:56:25 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> wrote: >-1 for merge. > >Custom-editing PKGBUILDs of AUR packages is not something users should >regularly do. > >If they are compelled to turn to such measures, that means either there is a >packaging error, or there needs to be a different variant of that package. > >Like in this case: >A separate moonscript package for main lua dependency, another one for lua51. > >Let's keep both packages as they are. > >This is not Gentoo where you can parameterize the build of the same package >source via USE flags. > >On 7 July 2023 10:56:45 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>KokaKiwi [1] filed a request to merge lua51-moonscript [2] into lua- >>moonscript [3]: >> >>lua51-moonscript can be handled by the lua-moonscript AUR package >>(just need to toggle a comment) >> >>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/KokaKiwi/ >>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lua51-moonscript/ >>[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lua-moonscript/
