See requests [PRQ#42640] on how to successfully reproduce AURweb request submission bug that happened with this current ([PRQ#42635]) request earlier.
On 23 June 2023 22:31:31 GMT+02:00, Mark Wagie <mark.wa...@proton.me> wrote: >That's weird. I initially chose merge request and chose loupe-git to merge >loupe into, but then changed my mind and created a deletion request instead. >Aurweb didn't like that, I guess? > > > > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > >------- Original Message ------- >On Friday, June 23rd, 2023 at 1:21 PM, Marcell Meszaros ><marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> wrote: > > >> I don't have an opinion about loupe or loupe-git packages. >> >> But merge request [PRQ#42635] had an AUR bug which should be looked upon - >> email was sent with subject line of Deletion request and body text of a >> merge request. >> >> I submitted a new merge request in the same direction, as [PRQ#42636], but >> was unable to reproduce the earlier glitch. >> >> On 23 June 2023 21:05:53 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros >> marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu wrote: >> >> > Haha, today is the day of many tech glitches is my life! :'-) >> > >> > AUR deletion request for a merge request - that's new! XD >> > >> > > Subject: [PRQ#42635] Deletion Request for loupe >> > > Body: yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge loupe [2] into >> > > loupe-git [3]: >> > >> > On 23 June 2023 20:46:01 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> > >> > > yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge loupe [2] into loupe-git >> > > [3]: >> > > >> > > Creating a "release" package is pointless as Loupe is still in >> > > development. It may or may not be ready for GNOME 45. I think loupe- >> > > git is good enough for now for those who want to test it. >> > > >> > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ >> > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/loupe/ >> > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/loupe-git/
