On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:18:28PM +1200, Charles Wise wrote: > On 2021-09-16 16:07, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > Request #28192 has been rejected by alex19EP [1]: > > > > should be the other way around. this package is binary and this is > > reflected in its name. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alex19EP/ > > Historically, Eclipse packages have never included a "-bin" prefix despite > being binary re-distribution - even when Eclipse was in the [community] > repository, it did not have a "-bin" prefix even though it was not compiled.
sorry i didn't know about that. > With this in mind, I would like to request an exemption to the "-bin" naming > based on the historical precedent of how Eclipse packages have been named > both officially and unofficially. If approved, I'll re-submit a request to > merge with eclipse-java [1]. looks logical to me. I will accept such requests next time. sorry for the inconvenience. > Regards, > Charles > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-java/ -- Sincerely, Alexander | Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
