I think you should heed Antiz’s warnings. Links in another thread, or nothing.
Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ > On Jan 28, 2024, at 10:08 AM, Pellegrino Prevete > <pellegrinoprev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> In contrast to what he is stating about me, I do build and test the packages >> from AUR and give feedback and recommendations based on evidence. It is him >> who apparently does not build his own packages, because many of them have >> bad source URLs, missing runtime dependencies, and other misconfigurations. >> >> Anyone can try to build, as an example, AUR/python2-pip's individual >> dependencies, and see how many fail to build. python2-pip has been broken on >> AUR due to unbuildable requirements ever since its submission in 2022-09. >> Even some that have been recently updated by him have such errors. > > He is at this very moment keeping filing requesting deletion requests for > dependencies of ipython2 because for some reason he is obsessed it does not > to be working (this is even more stressing because we are talking of a super > old package which has never ever stopped working at any time). > > He first started attacking the dependencies, then the package then again the > dependencies. > Now we are back full circle. > 1) The package is said broken because he has a dependency broken > 2) Then the dependency is to delete because the package is said broken > 3) Then the dependency is deleted, and the package can be said broken > 4) Now when you fix the package fixing the dependency you have him say what > he just sent about how my work is even damaging and the package should stay > down in general. > > I am tired this person does not use continuous integration to prove what he > says. > > He keeps and keeps asserting something does not work on his side yet he never > posts code to prove or to show what his issues are. > No propositions, no patches, nothing. > > It's insane we can have somebody who complains about everything this way and > who does not work to fix it himself. > > Because if you work a lot he has a lot of attack surface. > > So he is toxicity in person at this very moment, considering he is still > sending requests while we talk here. > > I invite you to reflect we are having this discussion because he can't fix > his undisclosed issues himself, nor he provides neutral context for his > issues, nor he is able to rollback to a previous version, nor he is able to > maintain a propositive attitude and materially read the code. > > At this point in time he looks so much of a child to me because he is saying > somebody who maintains around 500 packages some are outdated as if I would > not want to upgrade them. >
