On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:45:10AM -0400, t...@tswartz.net wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:16:10AM +0000, George Rawlinson via aur-general > wrote: > > On 22-04-18 17:50, aur--- via aur-general wrote: > > > As slow as it is, have you tried using Tor, you are only pushing pulling > > > PKGBUILD files, not gigabytes of data. > > > > > > Offtopic; does the AUR or any part of Arch offer .onion services? > > > > I don't think we do, is there actually any interest in this? > > > > -- > > George Rawlinson > > > I had raised this back in 2015 and the suggestion was shot down pretty hard > back then. > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-June/030939.html > > However, there were some useful suggestions last time around: > It may be possible to use the following by itself, or in combination with a > VPS > as others have mentioned. > http://gitolite.com/git-over-proxy.html > > > Fortunately, I'm no longer in a position where this is necessary for my > own work, though I too recall the difficulty in sharing packages with tcp/22 > closed/blocked/inaccessible. > > I'm hopeful that with the latest changes to AUR and with some new TU's in the > group, perhaps some opinions have changed to reconsider this option. > > Cheers, > -- > Tom Swartz
Apologies, to be clear; I had raised the issue about ssh on tcp/443; not the .onion services. Incidentally, I have also found my old AUR bug report/feature request about the same, and (at the time) did not appear to be a difficult feature to implement: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45364 I have no idea how it stands currently, 6.5 years later. Cheers, -- Tom Swartz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
