>Wednesday, November 10, 2021 12:00 AM +11:00 from Giancarlo Razzolini via >aur-general <aur-general@lists.archlinux.org>: > >Em novembro 8, 2021 21:23 George Rawlinson via aur-general escreveu: >> On 21-11-09 11:19, Daurnimator via aur-general wrote: >>> Deleting obvious spam packages shouldn't require two people. >>> >>> Furthermore, I don't think requiring a unverified member of the public >>> + a TU is much of a higher bar, aside from making spam removal more >>> difficult. >> >> Agreed. There's already an audit log (via aur-requests) of all actions >> taken. >> >> I am interested in seeing what others think (not just staff members) of >> the situation. >> >> -- >> George Rawlinson >> >If it helps, when I was a TU, every request I created myself, I would usually >not >be the one handling it. I always waited on another TU to handle it, because >there's >a clear interest conflict there. > >There are no rules preventing a TU from making a request and also being the >one handling >said request, but that's how I did things. However, I would handle requests >for clearly >problematic packages, like when I did a huge cleanup of manjaro packages. > >Perhaps make a rule preventing TU's from handling their own requests? > >Regards, >Giancarlo Razzolini Hi guys, > I am interested in seeing what others think (not just staff members) of the >situation. TUs are *Trusted Users* by definition, so they are trusted by... whom? and for... what?)) - I'd bet when they are wipe out spam comments and simply spam or nasty things like so, they don't have to get so called "four-eyes" approvals for that. But what's regarding their own requests, they should be well on their own, because thay are TUs. - We (ordinary Arch Linux users) trust them to do what they consider like a common sense. Arch developers are few, but TUs are many. Besides that (almost) every TU has gone through a two-step procedure admitting as a TU, which is clearly visible in this ML, regularly. - Once again: we trust them and their vision regarding common sense. (*Sidespin* : I notice this for a long period of time that stepped-down TUs still use their own emails with archlinux.org domain, at least in the current ML. And I wonder, why those email addresses not withdrawal upon their membership as TUs has finished? - Giancarlo, Alad, maybe someone else? - This is a funny curiosity, no more.))))) -- Kind regards, Radislav (Radicchio) Golubtsov Arch Linux and OpenBSD addict. http://rgolubtsov.github.io/
Re: [aur-general] Handling own requests (Was: [PRQ#29045] Deletion Request for hugo-bin)
Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:00:58 -0800
- Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#29045] ... George Rawlinson via aur-general
- [aur-general] Handling own... Brett Cornwall via aur-general
- Re: [aur-general] Hand... alad via aur-general
- Re: [aur-general] ... Kevin Morris via aur-general
- Re: [aur-gene... Daurnimator via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... George Rawlinson via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Kevin Morris via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Henry-Joseph Audéoud via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Alexander Epaneshnikov via aur-general
- Re: [aur-... Knut Ahlers via aur-general
- Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#29045] Delet... Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via aur-general