On 8/20/20 5:04 AM, Xyne wrote: > Given that there are only 4 votes even before 5.8 was released, there doesn't > seem to be a lot of demand for the package. Maintaining it until the very end > of obsolescence probably isn't worth it so I would file a removal request > citing the incompatibility with 5.8. If someone really wants to resurrect it, > they can.
Orphan Request Submitted, Since 5.2 did continue to provide functionality that was not yet mature in the rewite that are the 6.0/6.1 branches, an immediate deletion isn't warranted as the package used with LTS may well provide a seamless bridge while bugs are resolved against the 6.0/6.1 branches for some users. The entire 6.0/6.1 platform is barely 7 months old at this point. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
