On 2019-02-09 14:36 +0100 alad via aur-general wrote: >The "original" lsf looks like a joke/troll package to me, rather than >"trivial". I'd have deleted it even without community duplicate. > >Alad
To me it just looks like the package of someone discovering bash programming with ANSI escape codes and wanting to share. The fact that it's on github with a README.md and a preview is an argument against it being a joke/troll. Please explain why you feel differently and why such packages should be removed from the AUR. What exactly are your criteria for allowing a package to remain? The discussion is important because we need to have a general consensus on deletion criteria. Rogue TUs can't be allowed to roam the AUR deleting whatever they personally don't find useful on a given day. Xyne
