I did indeed try to contact the maintainer of sdl2-hg about half a year ago, and I also did comment in comment section that I do indeed have a PKGBUILD ready. I promise you I did this for "sdl2-hg". My fault for bottom posting, I was on my phone.
On 11/3/18, shoober420 <[email protected]> wrote: > That bug is so important, it is linked on the Arch wiki itself. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Steam/Troubleshooting#Segmentation_fault_when_disabling_runtime > > Maybe you are glamorizing your own perception of me onto the world Jason. I > do a lot for Arch, and this community. Do you maintain any packages and > debug, or just moderate the forums? > > On Saturday, November 3, 2018, shoober420 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have contributed to Arch, and Linux very much so. Especially for Steam. >> Here’s a fine example. >> >> https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/3863 >> >> This was discovered and resolved by yours truly. A lot of painstaking and >> debugging went into diagnosing that bug. I love Arch, and do a lot for >> this >> community. You should concentrate on all the good I have done, instead of >> all the supposed bad things I’ve done. >> >> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, shoober420 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Regardless of my past, I still haven’t been given a reason to being >>> rejected for maintaining “sdl2-hg”, when I have a PKGBUILD ready to >>> upload. >>> I have a lot of AUR packages to contribute, and its being halted by >>> misunderstandings of my humor. I can argue me being banned from the >>> forums >>> were misunderstandings as well. >>> >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, Jason Ryan via aur-general < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/11/18 at 10:34pm, Mark Weiman wrote: >>>> > On Sat, 2018-11-03 at 22:09 -0400, shoober420 via aur-general wrote: >>>> > > This still doesn't cover up the fact you gave NO WARNING before the >>>> > > suspension. Also, if you so desire 'high quality', and strive for >>>> > > this >>>> > > "political correctness", don't be a hypocrite and comment back the >>>> > > very way you don't want to be talked to. That doesn't give the >>>> > > impression of what you want achieved does it? This was all in fun >>>> > > and >>>> > > humor, not disrespect, and could have easily been diagnosed and >>>> > > resolved if you talked to me about this before making such a >>>> > > drastic >>>> > > decision. >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > This has nothing to do with "political correctness" and has to do >>>> > with >>>> > the fact that you sent multiple requests, one after another, that >>>> > were >>>> > denied with language that didn't really help the TUs know your >>>> > intent. >>>> > >>>> > The TUs are volunteers (probably have other important things to do as >>>> > well) and I wouldn't expect them to put any time into requests like >>>> > the >>>> > ones listed and just deny them. >>>> > >>>> > You only getting a week suspension "without warning" is quite >>>> > reasonable. >>>> > >>>> Given that OP was permabanned from the forums after repeated warnings >>>> and >>>> temporary bans, I would describe it as “unduly charitable”. >>>> >>>> /J >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> http://jasonwryan.com/ >>>> GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40 >>>> >>>> >
