On 03/11/18 at 10:34pm, Mark Weiman wrote: > On Sat, 2018-11-03 at 22:09 -0400, shoober420 via aur-general wrote: > > This still doesn't cover up the fact you gave NO WARNING before the > > suspension. Also, if you so desire 'high quality', and strive for > > this > > "political correctness", don't be a hypocrite and comment back the > > very way you don't want to be talked to. That doesn't give the > > impression of what you want achieved does it? This was all in fun and > > humor, not disrespect, and could have easily been diagnosed and > > resolved if you talked to me about this before making such a drastic > > decision. > > > > This has nothing to do with "political correctness" and has to do with > the fact that you sent multiple requests, one after another, that were > denied with language that didn't really help the TUs know your intent. > > The TUs are volunteers (probably have other important things to do as > well) and I wouldn't expect them to put any time into requests like the > ones listed and just deny them. > > You only getting a week suspension "without warning" is quite > reasonable. > Given that OP was permabanned from the forums after repeated warnings and temporary bans, I would describe it as “unduly charitable”.
/J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
