> Yes I did check the comments, which turned out to be a very old comment > about extra dependencies in rxvt-unicode-afterimage if enabled. Since > the mentioned package doesn't even exist today, I believe it's not an > issue anymore. That's good. I had to recompile `root` to properly link the other day and can confirm it worked for me, just wasn't sure in general as I couldn't find the history anymore.
On 14/10/2018 22:19, Felix Yan wrote: > On 10/1/18 2:51 AM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: >> I believe that is not true. I even enabled more functionality in >>> libafterimage, actually. >> You mean when you removed `--disable-svg` flag? I might be wrong, but I >> think there was a reason to leave it disabled. You'd have to check comments >> or Gentoo/Fedora package to be sure. > Yes I did check the comments, which turned out to be a very old comment > about extra dependencies in rxvt-unicode-afterimage if enabled. Since > the mentioned package doesn't even exist today, I believe it's not an > issue anymore. > >>> There's precedence for maintainers of specialized software in the AUR to be >>> >>> sponsored to become a Trusted User (though it seems there's a preexisting >>> >>> relationship?). >>> >>> I am not sure how much this applies to me in this case, but if it does I >>> can say the following. I am willing to apply for a Trusted User to maintain >>> ROOT's stack for Arch. I use the ROOT software on a daily basis. I take >>> great care of the package (the whole stack actually) as my work depends on >>> it. I have a test bench and people in my professional area use it and >>> depend on me to bring improvements and new possibilities. I have involved >>> myself and consider it an on-going duty. I have the skills and know-how to >>> maintain the ROOT stack and I can say with certainty that AUR's ROOT >>> package is only second to Fedora's package across other distros. But I also >>> understand it is not perfect and am interested in making it better as I've >>> shown previously here and to its users. > Glad to see your TU application, it would be great if you will maintain > the related software in the official repositories instead, as you are > definitely more familiar and I have too many packages already :) > > (I somehow forgot to reply to the question above, sorry for the late reply!) >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
