On 13/02/16 04:12 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > El 13/02/2016 a las 3:12 p. m., Connor Behan escribió: >>> WE, Dave Blair and I, BOTH SAID THE HARASSMENT WAS DONE *PRIVATELY*, yet >>> you are asking for public proof? Your sharpness is.... Sheesh! >> He didn't say that it would be easy for you to establish public proof >> (that would indeed warrant a "sheesh"). He said that no matter how hard >> it is to prove harassment, the onus for doing so is on the victim. Which >> it should be. I'm sure all people in this discussion agree that the >> bullying you describe is completely unacceptable, but we simply cannot >> be banning users based on scenarios that are simply one person's word >> against another's. > What you say is true Connor and your comment is *very constructive*. I > simply deleted the emails at the time , because I do not like gloating > on bad blood therefore I can't provide that evidence anymore; but be > assured it built up for at least 6 months before I finally threw the > towel in disgust. I had to play whack-a-mole with the guy blocking > accounts from where he would send me personal insults and attacks. > > As long as we have your attention. Can you bring the matter in the > private lists? There is a real need for some sort of reporting channel > that is not a project in Flyspray but more private. And as Ralf Mardorf > already said, a CoC is not needed. I frankly believe a CoC would be > completely counterproductive. Thanks.
I asked about this in #archlinux-tu and the one reply so far said it would be best to start things off with a request to aur-general which doesn't name names. The first TU to see it could then follow up off-list and learn the details. If that's uncomfortable for some, maybe just pick an email from the TU list [1] to contact. Of the "active" TUs, some are more active than others and a look through the mailing list archives can help narrow it down. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
